dpk: SRFI 204 appears to be stuck at draft #10 taylan: Zipheir: you mean like (? x y z) in the commonly used 'match' macro e.g. dpk: taylan: depends if we get a procedural record-type interface in R7, i guess -) Zipheir: taylan: Except in pattern-matching. we don't have many other naming conventions which are used in completely different scenarios) I use in comments to denote variables, so it fits my style :> taylan: dpk: doesn't really matter IMO because record names are rarely ever used outside their definition ManDay: just for my debugging stuff (which is not functional), I ended up there dpk: taylan: nice, but conflicts with the convention of using to enclose the names of record types
ManDay: and since I'm writing purely functional, this is always the case for me nevertheless, I think there is no disagreement that if it can be done w/o macros (nicely), it should be done without macros Taylan: (define-syntax when (syntax-rules ((when *.
0 kommentar(er)
